NEW

Start with the pressure: sales, launch, abuse, agents, data, or guardrails

Evidence

All services

Prove and assure your AI security claims with buyer-ready evidence.

Turn findings, controls, remediation, and residual risk into a transparent proof trail that buyers, auditors, and leadership can verify.

Evidence metrics dashboard diagram

Claim-readiness evidence

Evidence visual operating model

BUYER-READY EVIDENCE

WORKBENCH-BACKED

Evidence Packet Preview

From adversarial finding → control → retest → buyer evidence.

  1. 01

    Architecture

    Map the system, data flows, identities, and control boundaries.

    • AI assets & capabilities
    • RAG / data flows
    • Tool & agent permissions
    • Identity boundaries
    • External integrations
    OUTPUT: System Map
  2. 02

    Findings

    Adversarial testing uncovers exploitable paths and security gaps.

    • XPIA / indirect prompt injection
    • Tool abuse & escalation
    • Context leakage
    • RAG poisoning / data exposure
    • Severity & reproduction
    OUTPUT: Findings Report
  3. 03

    Controls

    Convert findings into controls and define verification strategy.

    • Recommended controls
    • Release gates
    • Telemetry requirements
    • Retest criteria
    • Residual risk notes
    OUTPUT: Control Plan
  4. 04

    Mapping

    Map work to the frameworks buyers and auditors use.

    • OWASP Top 10 for LLMs
    • MITRE ATLAS
    • NIST AI RMF
    • ISO / IEC 42001
    • SOC 2 (CC6, CC7, CC8)
    • EU AI Act (risk & obligations)
    OUTPUT: Control Crosswalk
  5. 05

    Buyer Evidence

    Package artifacts that answer questions and drive decisions.

    • Executive summary
    • Questionnaire responses
    • Residual risk summary
    • Remediation backlog
    • Trust center excerpts
    OUTPUT: Evidence Bundle

Procurement-ready by default.

Engagements are scoped, human-reviewed, and artifact-controlled.

  • NDA
  • DPA
  • SOW
  • ROE
  • EVIDENCE HANDLING
  • SUBPROCESSORS

Buyer questions

  • - What can we show enterprise buyers?
  • - What evidence supports our claims?
  • - What should sales, legal, and security say or not say?
  • - How do findings map to OWASP, NIST AI RMF, MITRE ATLAS, ISO 42001, SOC 2, or EU AI Act language?
  • - What governance operating model keeps the evidence current?
Flagship
EvidenceAvailable

evidence_pack

AI Security Sales Enablement

A workshop-first evidence sprint for AI-enabled products, designed to help sales, SE, product, legal, and security teams answer enterprise AI-security questions without improvisation.

Outcome

6 deliverables

Best for

Founder, Sales Engineering, CISO, Security, Legal, Product Marketing

  • Buyer FAQ
  • Questionnaire answer bank
  • Model and provider boundary statement
  • Claim-readiness notes
Duration: 5–10 business days (up to 2–4 weeks)Scoped through no-cost scoping
Flagship
EvidenceAvailable

program_build

AI Governance & Security Program Build

A program-building engagement that turns AI security from scattered policy into operating model, ownership, controls, evidence, workflows, and governance cadence.

Outcome

6 deliverables

Best for

CISO, CTO, AI Governance Lead, Security Program Lead, Legal/GRC

  • AI security operating model, ownership, governance cadence, and evidence lifecycle
  • Policy/control mapping across NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, OWASP, MITRE ATLAS, and internal controls
  • Secure AI SDLC program design, intake workflows, release gates, and decision records
  • Fractional CISO/vCISO-style advisory module when leadership capacity is needed
Duration: 4-10 weeks or retainerScoped through no-cost scoping

Sample deliverables

Enterprise AI Security Evidence Pack
Enterprise AI Security Questionnaire Answer Bank
AI Buyer FAQ
Model Provider Boundary Statement
AI Governance Evidence Matrix
Publication & Claim-Readiness Matrix
Control Ownership Matrix
Evidence Lifecycle Plan