AI product security services

Choose the AI security engagement that matches your decision.

From launch readiness to buyer evidence, each engagement is scoped around one decision, one timeline, and one set of usable deliverables.

Compare core services

Urgent launch gate

Launch GateMap + Attack + Evidence

Need a release decision in the next 30–60 days?

Start with the AI Launch Security Review. Find launch-blocking abuse paths and control gaps, get first findings in 5 business days, and leave with a prioritized fix list and release decision pack.

Offer

AI Launch Security Review

Timeline

First findings in 5 business days. Launch-ready review in 5–10 business days.

Outputs

Launch Risk Memo
Abuse-Path Findings
Release Gate Checklist
Sprint-Ready Fix Backlog
Buyer-Ready Evidence Summary

Review launch readiness See what we review

Know what can break, what must be fixed before launch, and what evidence product, security, leadership, and enterprise buyers can rely on. Compare service paths.

Start with the buyer pressure.

Choose the path that matches the decision.

Pick the path that matches the decision in front of you: launch, scanner coverage, program baseline, enterprise security review, team training, or AI security hiring.

Ship AI Soon

AI Launch Security Review

We are launching an AI feature, copilot, RAG system, agent, or workflow soon and need launch-risk clarity fast.

For:: Founder, CTO, VP Product, Head of Engineering, Product Security, AppSec owner
Result:: First findings in 5 business days. Launch-ready review in 5–10 business days.
You'll get:: You'll get a Launch Risk Memo and a go/no-go release gate.

Scope a Launch Review

Unblock a Deal

AI Security Sales Enablement

Enterprise buyers are asking AI security questions we cannot answer cleanly, and the deal/security review is slowing down.

For:: Founder, CEO, Sales Engineer, Head of Sales, Customer Trust, Security Assurance, GRC
Result:: First evidence-gap readout in 5 business days. Buyer-ready pack in 5–10 business days where scope allows.
You'll get:: You'll get a buyer-ready evidence summary and an answer bank.

Unblock a Security Review

Bound Agent Authority

Agentic Workflow Security & Hardening

Agents, tools, credentials, workflows, approvals, and actions have unclear blast radius.

For:: AI platform lead, engineering manager, security engineer, automation owner, product owner
Result:: First authority map and abuse-path readout in 5 business days. Hardened review plan in 5–10 business days.
You'll get:: You'll get a tool permission matrix and an agent authority graph.

Scope Agent Risk

Get to Yes Internally

No-Cost Scoping Retainer

We may want to move, but vendor onboarding, NDA, finance, SOW, procurement, security review, and internal justification can stall everything.

For:: Champion who needs legal, finance, procurement, security, and product aligned before paid work can start.
Result:: No-cost scoping packet immediately. Draft review plan after intake. Paid SOW/private offer after scope is clear.
You'll get:: You'll get an NDA, a procurement packet, and an internal approval memo.

Start No-Cost Scoping

SecEng Code Scanner OEM Pilot

Your scanner covers web, APIs, and infrastructure. It doesn't cover AI-generated code, LLM apps, or agentic workflows — and customers are starting to ask.

For:: Scanner vendor founder, product owner, CTO, head of AppSec product, commercial/partnerships lead
Result:: Feasibility Sprint: 2 weeks. 30-Day OEM Pilot: 30 days. White-Label Productization: 8–12 weeks.
You'll get:: You'll get a working invocation plan, JSON/SARIF/Markdown output examples, AppCheck-style report mapping, and annual license terms.

Request OEM Pilot Packet

Role Readiness / Platform Partner Add-On

Training platforms prove skills but can't answer 'which AI security role is this person ready for' or 'how should our enterprise customers hire for AI security' — leaving practitioners without career direction and corporate buyers without workforce evidence.

For:: VP Product, BD lead, or partnerships director at a cybersecurity training platform, cyber range, certification provider, or enterprise L&D company
Result:: Pilot validation: 2 weeks. Platform Integration: 4–8 weeks. Strategic License: by negotiation.
You'll get:: You'll get a role taxonomy sample, Q&A bank preview, integration architecture spec, and commercial terms.

Request Platform Partner Pack

Scope a Pen Test or Red Team

Pen Test & Red Team Readiness Packet

We want to commission a pen test or red team but don't have the scope definition, authorization documents, ROE, evidence handling plan, or vendor criteria in place yet.

For:: Offensive security lead, red team coordinator, AppSec manager, CISO office scoping an external pen test or red team engagement
Result:: Readiness packet delivery: 5–10 business days. Engagement-ready authorization: after your legal and technical owners sign off.
You'll get:: You'll get a scoped ROE, authorization pack, evidence handling policy, and vendor selection criteria.

Build Readiness Packet

AI Security Academy

We need structured AI security training for our teams but have no budget for a custom curriculum build, and off-the-shelf compliance training doesn't cover LLMs, agents, RAG, or AI product security.

For:: L&D lead, CISO, security training program manager, HR/enablement director, or team lead at an organization with 50+ security, engineering, product, or governance staff
Result:: Team access live within 1–3 business days. LMS package delivery: 2–4 weeks. Private cohort: scheduled by agreement.
You'll get:: You'll get course access, a team training plan, manager reports, and an LMS package (by scope).

Request Enterprise Training Packet

Readiness Packet

Pen Test & Red Team Readiness Packet

Cobalt-style onboarding for scoped security testing, adversarial review, cloud assessment, and AI/agentic red teaming.

Scope Brief & Target Inventory
Rules of Engagement & Authorization
Access Plan & Evidence Handling
Required contracts + Draft SOW inputs

Build a Pentest Readiness Packet Prepare Rules of Engagement

Testing only proceeds against targets your organization owns, controls, or is explicitly authorized to assess.

Primary commercial paths

Start with the problem blocking launch, revenue, or readiness

The scorecard is the baseline path, not a separate maturity line item. Hidden or specialist modules remain available as follow-ons below.

Map

AI Launch Security Review

Need a go/no-go decision before release? Find launch-blocking abuse paths, data exposure, and control gaps fast.

Best for

Teams that need the first findings before launch and a clear release decision.

Common scopes / modules

Launch risk memoGraph-backed abuse pathsRelease gate checklistDefense breakpoint fix backlogBuyer-ready evidence summary

Primary output

AI Launch Risk Memo

Markdown

Sample outputs

- AI Security Discovery / Intake Pack
- AI Control Gap Assessment
- AI Security Remediation Roadmap

Review launch readiness Inspect deliverables

Map

AI Product Security Assessment

Need deeper coverage? Map architecture, trust boundaries, RAG, agents, application code, and evidence across the full product.

Best for

Teams that have already triaged launch risk and need a broader product-security baseline.

Common scopes / modules

AI system inventoryArchitecture reviewThreat modelingPrivacy and authorization reviewEvidence readiness

Primary output

AI System Inventory

JSON

Sample outputs

- AI Security Discovery / Intake Pack
- AI System Inventory / Application Register
- AI Architecture Review
- AI Control Gap Assessment
- AI Security Remediation Roadmap

Review the full assessment Inspect deliverables

Attack

AI Red Team & Adversarial Testing

Need to know what an attacker can actually reproduce? Test prompt injection, retrieval abuse, tool misuse, and unsafe autonomy.

Best for

Teams that need replayable, graph-backed abuse evidence before buyers, auditors, or attackers find the issue first.

Common scopes / modules

RAG and XPIA testingHostile-document testingModel abuse validationTool misuse testingCross-tenant leakage checks

Primary output

AI Red-Team Findings Register

Markdown

Sample outputs

- AI Red-Team Scope Document
- AI Red-Team Findings Register
- AI Red Team Executive Summary
- RAG Security Test Plan
- AI Red-Team Remediation Roadmap

Scope an AI red team Inspect deliverables

Defend

Agent & Workflow Security Hardening

Need safer tools and actions in production? Tighten permissions, approvals, logging, rollback, and release controls.

Best for

Teams that already know the agent can act and need to reduce blast radius.

Common scopes / modules

Permission designApproval gatesRollback controlsLogging and observabilityTool policy design

Primary output

AI Release Gate Checklist

YAML

Sample outputs

- Agent Tool Permission Matrix
- AI Release Gate Checklist
- AI Incident Response Playbook
- AI Security Remediation Roadmap

Scope agent hardening Inspect deliverables

Evidence

AI Security Sales Enablement

Enterprise deals are slowing on AI security? Build one reviewed answer set and evidence package across sales, security, product, and legal.

Best for

Teams whose enterprise deals are stalled by customer security review.

Common scopes / modules

Buyer-ready evidence packQuestionnaire supportBuyer FAQTrust-center AI evidenceClaim-readiness notes

Primary output

Enterprise AI Security Evidence Pack

Markdown

Sample outputs

- Enterprise AI Security Evidence Pack
- AI Buyer FAQ
- Security Questionnaire Answer Bank
- Model Provider Boundary Statement
- Marketplace-readiness claim support

Build buyer-ready answers Inspect deliverables

Evidence

AI Security Program Baseline & Build

Need ownership, priorities, and a defensible roadmap? Baseline the program and turn gaps into controls, owners, and evidence.

Best for

Teams that need a fast baseline before deeper assessment or buildout work.

Common scopes / modules

Baseline controlsGap heatmapOwnership mappingRoadmapEvidence readiness

Primary output

AI Security Program Scorecard

Markdown

Sample outputs

- AI Security Maturity Scorecard
- AI Control Gap Assessment
- AI Governance Evidence Matrix
- AI Security Remediation Roadmap
- AI Security Operating Model Blueprint

Baseline the program Inspect deliverables

Follow-on modules

Keep the hidden or specialist tracks available, but off the primary menu.

These modules feed the commercial tracks, but they are not the first thing the public menu should sell.

Specialist follow-on

AI Guardrails & Evals Review

Specialist follow-on for guardrails, eval coverage, refusal behavior, regression cases, and release criteria.

Demoted specialist module under Defend. Keep it available, but not in the primary six.

Open route

Follow-on module

Program Buildout

Follow-on operating model, control ownership, evidence cadence, and roadmap execution.

This is the commercial follow-through for scorecard work, not a separate peer service line.

Open route

Legacy label

AI Security Maturity Benchmark

Legacy baseline label folded into the scorecard path for teams that need a faster first artifact.

Keep for legacy scoping only; do not treat as a separate primary service.

Open route

Hidden module

Agentic Workflow Abuse Review

Delegated-action abuse testing folded into red teaming and hardening rather than a separate peer service.

Use this as an internal module beneath red teaming or hardening, not as a menu peer.

Open route

Buyer triggers

AI launch is imminent.

AI Launch Security Review - an AI feature, copilot, RAG system, agent, or workflow ships in the next 30-60 days.

We do not know where to start.

AI Security Program Scorecard

We need deeper product security review.

AI Product Security Assessment

We need adversarial evidence.

AI Red Teaming

Our agent can take actions.

Agentic Workflow Hardening

Our guardrails/evals are weak.

AI Guardrails & Evals Review

Governance is policy, not operations.

Program Buildout follow-on under the scorecard

Enterprise buyers are blocking deals.

AI Security Sales Enablement

Who this is for

CISO

Unblock the board.

Audit-ready evidence for your next QBR - controls mapped, gaps closed, claims you can sign.

VP Product

Unblock the launch.

Release-gate artifacts your engineers can deploy before the next sprint ends.

Eng Lead

Unblock the backlog.

Remediation roadmap in sprint-ready language - not a PDF, not a presentation.

Sales Lead

Unblock the buyer.

Answer-bank and evidence pack that answers the enterprise RFP before the deal stalls.

How we work

From first call to engineering artifact in days, not quarters.

No-cost scoping intake

We identify the launch pressure, target system, evidence needs, authorization path, and required packet before paid work begins.

Proposal

SOW with scope, timeline, artifact list, and price range delivered within 24 hours.

Engagement

High-velocity 2-week sprints with continuous access to engineering outputs and async review cycles.

Output

Engineering-ready artifacts and decision-ready evidence - machine-readable where it matters.

Workbench-backed delivery

Every engagement produces engineering-ready remediation and decision-ready evidence.

From adversarial finding to attack path to defense breakpoint to retest to validated evidence trail. Six primary paths across the MADE lifecycle keep the public menu readable while the follow-on modules preserve the deeper commercial tracks.

Open sample outputs Send us your questionnaire

Service packet

The quote-first path is wired to the same contract library.

Each service uses the same contract packet registry so SOWs, NDAs, payment terms, and fulfillment steps stay aligned with the service you selected.

Stripe-optimized packet

Statement of Work Template

Mission-specific scope, deliverables, timeline, access, assumptions, and acceptance criteria for scoped AI security engagements.

Mutual NDA

Mutual confidentiality protections for pre-sales, delivery, and research collaboration contexts.

Used for NDA baseline

Data Processing Addendum

Controller/processor allocation, data protection obligations, subprocessing, security measures, AI provider boundaries, and customer-data handling for scoped services.

Used for Data handling and public-safe claims

Publication & Claim-Readiness Policy

Claim-readiness criteria for public research, trust pages, scorecards, attestations, sponsor materials, security review outputs, and buyer-facing evidence.

Used for Data handling and public-safe claims · Sponsored research and launch

Payment terms

Net 30 or prepaid invoice depending on the engagement.

Acceptance terms

Accepted when the agreed deliverables are delivered and the client has had a reasonable factual review window.

Fulfillment workflow

scope -> draft SOW -> quote -> invoice -> kickoff

Request private offer View pricing bands

Part of AI Security Services