NEW

Start with the pressure: sales, launch, abuse, agents, data, or guardrails

Map · Discover · Baseline

SecEng Map

Map the AI system before you test the model.

Identify the architecture, data paths, identities, providers, retrieval boundaries, tools, credentials, and delegated authority that determine how the AI product can actually fail.

SecEng Map creates the system context every later security decision depends on. We trace models, applications, APIs, retrieval paths, agents, tools, identities, permissions, external providers, sensitive data, ownership, and evidence gaps, then turn that context into a reviewable security baseline for Attack, Defend, and Evidence.

Connected context

Map once. Use the context everywhere.

Mapping is not documentation for its own sake. The same system context drives Code Scanner prioritization, adversarial scenarios, Authority Graph analysis, APC grounding, defensive control design, retest conditions, and final evidence.

1

MAP

System + trust-boundary context

2

ATTACK

What can actually fail?

3

DEFEND

What control changes the outcome?

4

EVIDENCE

What can we prove afterward?

Capabilities

What Map makes visible.

System architecture

Models, applications, APIs, SDKs, gateways, vector stores, retrieval layers, MCP servers, agents, tools, browser surfaces, and external providers.

Trust boundaries

Where identities, tenants, sensitive data, model providers, retrieval contexts, tools, and external systems cross security boundaries.

RAG and data paths

Trace query, authorization, retrieval, provenance, policy checks, context assembly, model invocation, and response flow before testing for leakage or poisoning.

Agent authority

Map what agents and tools can read, write, send, execute, administer, approve, and change, including credentials, approval gates, and external effects.

Ownership and release gates

Identify who owns each system, control, exception, and release decision before a finding becomes an organizational orphan.

Evidence gaps

Expose missing diagrams, logging, ownership records, control mappings, architecture decisions, review artifacts, and buyer evidence before they become blockers.

Workbench capabilities that support Map

The context layer that feeds Attack, Defend, and Evidence.

Workbench capability

SecEng Threat Canvas

Model the AI system as a security canvas: applications, external entities, models, RAG paths, agents, tools, data stores, trust boundaries, and data flows in one reviewable architecture.

Workbench capability

SecEng Authority Graph

Model delegated authority across agents, identities, credentials, tools, MCP servers, approvals, and downstream systems, including dangerous permission compositions and blast radius.

Workbench capability

SecEng Code Scanner

Find code-derived AI security paths across LLM applications, RAG, agents, MCP, tool calling, model integrations, and AI-specific trust boundaries, then carry relevant paths into Attack.

Service

AI Security Program Baseline

Baseline ownership, control, evidence, and program-level gaps before launch or roadmap decisions.

Service

AI Launch Security Review

For a product or feature shipping soon.

Service

AI Product Security Assessment

For deeper whole-product architecture and trust-boundary review.

Workbench capability

SecEng Surface Scanner

Discover AI-native surfaces from browser, repo, and IDE signals when you need discovery data feeding Map.

Workbench capability

SecEng Trust Scanner

Review public trust, legal, governance, security, and SDLC artifacts for coherence and evidence gaps.

Stage flow

1

MAP

Inventory and trust-boundary context.

2

ATTACK

Reproduce what actually fails.

3

DEFEND

Change the controls that break the path.

4

EVIDENCE

Preserve what was tested and proven.