PARTNERS

Embed, resell, or white-label AI security — OEM, scanner, MSSP, consulting, and reseller tracks are open now

AI SECURITY WORKBENCH · ATTACK PATH ANALYSIS

Turn connected evidence into defensible attack paths.

Most security reports stop at individual findings. Attack Path Analysis asks which findings, identities, permissions, workflows, runtime observations, code relationships, and control weaknesses combine into a supported route toward consequential impact.

Grounded where we know. Explicit where we infer.

Four-stage path analysis

01

Correlate the evidence

Connect target-, environment-, code-, runtime-, identity-, authority-, partner-, and system-specific evidence without treating proximity or correlation as proof of a path.

02

Construct candidate paths

Model plausible earlier, intermediate, or later steps as explicit hypotheses. Record required preconditions, supporting precedent, confidence, and missing evidence. Inference remains distinct from grounded fact.

03

Challenge and validate the path

Test evidence grounding, identity and authority assumptions, path sequence, ATT&CK mapping, reachability, preconditions, alternative explanations, and claimed consequence.

04

Prioritize remediation chokepoints

Identify the controls, permissions, approvals, boundaries, components, or relationships that interrupt the most consequential supported paths. Define remediation ownership and retest conditions.

Graph-backed path analysis

From connected evidence to qualified paths.

Attack Path Analysis combines fragmented security observations with system, identity, authority, code, runtime, and control context to construct evidence-qualified paths and structured remediation outputs.

Prompt-injectionfindingBroad tool permissionShared identityMissing approvalboundaryRuntime traceTRANSFORMATIONgraph-backedanalysis engineEvidence fusion into authority graphPath constructionIndependent validationRisk drivers and priorityValidated pathclustersGrounded andinferred labelsATT&CK mappingMITRE AttackFlow exportNavigator layerRemediationchokepointsRetest andanalyst review

Grounded where we know. Explicit where we infer.

Grounded path steps

Each grounded step references target-, environment-, code-, runtime-, identity-, authority-, partner-, or system-specific evidence.

Explicit hypotheses

Possible earlier, intermediate, or later steps remain clearly labeled as inferred, confidence-scored, and dependent on stated preconditions.

What Attack Path Analysis returns

candidate attack paths
grounded attack paths
validated or reproduced attack paths
related path clusters
observed, derived, grounded, and inferred step labels
evidence and provenance references
identity, authority, and workflow context
sequence and precondition analysis
MITRE ATT&CK mappings
attack graph view
MITRE Attack Flow export where supported
ATT&CK Navigator export where supported
risk and remediation drivers
remediation chokepoints
retest conditions
machine-validation state
analyst-review state

Scope note

Attack Path Analysis performs defensive analysis of supported security paths at the system, identity, authority, code, runtime, tactic, technique, and procedure levels. It does not generate exploit code, credential material, payloads, or step-by-step intrusion instructions.

Evidence groundingValidationATT&CKPath priorityReview state

Claim states

Not every connected route has the same claim state.

Code-risk path

A static or configuration-derived route requiring broader context.

Authority path

A route showing effective access and action capability.

Candidate abuse path

A plausible misuse route requiring validation.

Candidate attack path

A possible path supported by some target-specific context.

Grounded attack path

A path whose material steps are supported by system-specific evidence.

Validated attack path

A grounded path whose sequence, preconditions, and consequence have been challenged and supported.

Reproduced attack path

A validated path demonstrated through controlled execution.

Rejected path

A proposed route whose assumptions or preconditions were not supported.

Definitions

Graph, flow, and path are related—but not interchangeable.

The graph contains entities and relationships. A flow describes ordered activity through those relationships. A path is a security-relevant route through the graph. Evidence determines how strongly each entity, relationship, flow, or path can be asserted.

Remediation chokepoint

Interrupt the paths.

Related attack paths may converge on a small number of authority, approval, component, data, tool, or control weaknesses. Prioritize the changes that interrupt the most consequential supported paths, then retest the original conditions.

PATH-02

Interrupt the paths.

Related attack paths may converge on a small number of authority, approval, component, data, tool, or control weaknesses. Prioritize the changes that interrupt the most consequential supported paths, then retest the original conditions.

Related attack paths may converge on a small number of authority, approval, component, data, tool, or control weaknesses. Prioritize the changes that interrupt the most consequential supported paths, then retest the original conditions.

Prompt and instructionpathTool-abuse pathIdentity-abuse pathSHARED WEAKNESSSharedweaknessesCONTROLRemediationchokepointPrompt pathblockedTool path blockedResidual identitypathRetest evidence
Path blockedReduced, not eliminatedRetested and confirmed