Add AI-native coverage to the scanner your customers already use.
Extend an existing AppSec or vulnerability-scanning product with SecEng capabilities for AI-generated code, LLM applications, RAG, agents, MCP, tool use, authority paths, and multi-step attack-path analysis — without replacing the scanner, workflow, or customer experience you already own.
HOW IT WORKS
One finding in. Enriched context out.
Your scanner sends a structured finding or event. SecEng adds AI-native analysis, evidence, and lifecycle state, then returns the result through your existing workflow.
Partner Findings Lifecycle
AI-native findings return into the partner product with lifecycle state preserved through review, remediation, rescan, and retest.
Round-trip integration showing partner finding or scan evidence, SecEng enrichment, partner-native return, and the rescan or retest loop.
- 1Partner finding or scan evidenceTarget • Request/response evidence • Workflow observation • Stable issue identity
- 2SecEng enrichmentAI-native path • Evidence qualification • Authority context • Validation state • Remediation
- 3Partner-native returnPreserved issue identity • Reporting state • Remediation status • Retest condition
- 4Rescan or retestLifecycle history remains connected to the original issue
Keep the finding. Add the context.
The test is not whether SecEng can generate another report. It is whether an existing scanner finding can return through the partner's own workflow with materially better context and evidence — without losing its identity.
1{2"finding_id": "partner-98271",3"severity": "High",4"component": "agent/tool-runner",5"location": "services/agent/runner.py:142",6"description": "Retrieved context can influence a consequential tool call."7}
1{2"return_id": "seceng-demo-018",3"finding_id": "partner-98271",4"evidence_refs": ["source-path-142", "tool-policy-07"],5"lifecycle_state": "enriched_retest_required",6"ai_attack_path": "retrieved_context -> agent_decision -> consequential_tool",7"remediation": "Constrain tool arguments and require approval before execution.",8"validation_state": "not_validated_pending_retest"9}
Sanitized reference example. Exact fields and mapping depend on the partner's finding model and the agreed pilot contract.
Optional expansion: Where several supported findings combine, Attack Path Chaining can qualify the resulting path and identify shared remediation chokepoints.
Start with a bounded contract, not a platform replacement.
Detailed format maturity and adapter registries live on Partner Interoperability. This is the bounded contract the pilot actually tests.
Versioned JSON preserves issue identity, evidence references, lifecycle state, validation, and mapping decisions.
SARIF and other supported vulnerability shapes can be used where they fit the partner workflow.
The pilot tests the partner's actual object and lifecycle requirements before any public compatibility or production-support claim.
A scanner pilot should prove uplift, evidence quality, lifecycle fit, and production viability.
What the pilot asks from each side.
Supply one sanitized finding, schema, representative scan result, or bounded target. SecEng enriches it and returns an agreed object so both sides can determine whether the added coverage is useful inside the existing scanner workflow.
- 1–2 engineering contacts
- Sample findings or fixture set
- Schema review
- Mapping approval
- Test environment
- Engine invocation
- Finding enrichment
- Evidence handling
- Adapter configuration
- Pilot readout and production recommendation
Production adapter included only after conversion
Productize only if the result improves the scanner.
Exact pilot, implementation, and licensing terms depend on the selected capability, integration burden, deployment model, customer scope, and support requirements.
- 1
Pilot
Prove one finding and one native return path.
- 2
Productize
Harden the adapter, lifecycle, release, monitoring, and support boundary.
- 3
License
Agree selected capabilities, deployment, customer scope, update entitlement, and any OEM or white-label rights.
Start with one representative finding.
Prove the contract, the enrichment, and the return path before you commit to a deeper integration.