APCS-02
Path Validation Workflow
Candidate paths are challenged for evidence, ordering, consequence, and alternatives before they become reportable.
governed lifecycle
APCS-02
Path Validation Workflow
Candidate paths are challenged for evidence, ordering, consequence, and alternatives before they become reportable.
Governed APC-backed review workflow from candidate path through evidence review, sequence review, consequence review, correction, analyst review, and report state.
Review workflow
- 1Ingest representative findingsAccept the agreed finding, trace, graph, or partner object with source references.
- 2Construct candidate pathsGroup related findings and relationships without assuming the chain is valid.
- 3Challenge evidenceConfirm each step, source, precondition, and relevant observation.
- 4Challenge orderingReview prerequisites, transition feasibility, and alternate sequences.
- 5Bound consequenceLimit impact to what the evidence and reachable actions support.
- 6Correct or rejectSplit, downgrade, revise, or reject unsupported paths.
Retest loop returns to Construct candidate paths
What result is reportable?
- Grounded path
- Explicit inferred extension
- Rejected path
- Analyst-reviewed result