Developers
Use AI coding assistants without reinventing unsafe auth, validation, logging, or dependencies.
Start with the pressure: sales, launch, abuse, agents, data, or guardrails
The course that teaches developers and security teams to prompt, review, test, gate, and evidence AI-assisted code before it becomes production risk.
Built for developers, AppSec, product security, platform teams, SDLC leaders, and AI governance owners.
What you'll master
Go from AI coding chaos to controlled delivery
Frame secure prompts
with constraints and tests
Review generated code
for real security failures
Use paved-path components
instead of one-off invention
Gate releases with evidence
before production
Live preview
Can we merge this AI-generated auth helper?
High riskBuilt for your reality
Use AI coding assistants without reinventing unsafe auth, validation, logging, or dependencies.
Review AI-generated code with a shared rubric, not one-off guesswork.
Build paved paths, model gateways, and approved components developers actually use.
Turn AI coding policy into repeatable developer behavior and release gates.
Show evidence that AI-assisted delivery is controlled, reviewed, and auditable.
Speed needs a control path
This course gives teams the standards, reviews, prompts, gates, and evidence needed to make AI-assisted coding production-ready.
Enterprise experience
“The question isn't whether your developers use AI to write code. It's whether your guardrails make that usage safe enough for production.”
Why this course exists
Security no longer starts after code is generated. It starts when a developer frames the task, chooses context, grants tool access, accepts a dependency, writes a test, and decides whether the output is safe enough to merge.
The goal is not to slow anyone down. It is to give developers a paved path: secure defaults, approved components, strong prompts, review rubrics, automated checks, and release evidence that are also the easiest way to work.
Heads up
The enterprise problem
Ban AI coding and it moves into shadow workflows. The real question is whether your standards, gateways, tests, and reviews make AI-assisted code safe enough to ship.
Comparison
Before — speed without a paved path
After — a paved path with evidence
Audience action grid
Secure prompting and review habits that ship faster, safely.
An AI-specific review rubric and CI/CD gate design.
Paved-path patterns, gateways, and approved components.
A program that turns AI policy into developer behavior.
Evidence that AI-assisted delivery is under control.
Checklist
Program at a glance
Curriculum
Operating principles
A prompt is a specification, a threat-model hint, a constraints document, and a review contract — not just a request for code.
Do not make every developer and every model session reinvent authentication, authorization, validation, logging, and model access controls.
Static checks, tests, dependency review, secrets scanning, model-assisted review, and human accountability together — no single judge is enough.
A secure AI coding program leaves artifacts behind: standards, PR notes, test outputs, release gates, gateway logs, and review decisions.
Artifact list
Hands-on practice
Flexible delivery
Self-paced course
Work through it solo inside the Academy.
Enterprise workshop
Live, hands-on for your engineering org.
Secure SDLC onboarding
Make it part of how new engineers ramp.
Slack or Teams challenge
A drip sequence that builds secure habits.
SCORM / LMS package
Drop it into your existing training platform.
AIPSA Defend / Evidence module
Plug it into the broader AIPSA program.
Framework
Primary domains: Defend and Evidence — controlling AI-assisted development and proving it.
Also supports: Map (discovering developer AI usage) and Attack (testing AI-generated code for failure modes).
Related AIPSA products
Start the course
Bring Secure Coding with GenAI to your engineering org as a self-paced course, an SDLC onboarding module, or a live workshop — and ship AI-assisted code you can stand behind.
Build, review, test, and ship AI-assisted code safely.
Your developers are already shipping AI-generated code. This course gives engineering and security teams the standards, prompts, reviews, gateways, and gates that turn that speed into a paved path — instead of security debt.
“The question isn't whether your developers use AI to write code. It's whether your guardrails make that usage safe enough for production.”
Security no longer starts after code is generated. It starts when a developer frames the task, chooses context, grants tool access, accepts a dependency, writes a test, and decides whether the output is safe enough to merge.
The goal isn't to slow anyone down. It's to give developers a paved path — secure defaults, approved components, strong prompts, review rubrics, automated checks, and release evidence — that's also the easiest way to work.
| You are | What this course gives you |
|---|---|
| Developers using AI coding assistants | Secure prompting and review habits that ship faster, safely |
| AppSec & product security engineers | An AI-specific review rubric and CI/CD gate design |
| Platform engineers | Paved-path patterns, gateways, and approved components |
| Secure SDLC & engineering managers | A program that turns AI policy into developer behavior |
| AI governance teams & CISOs | Evidence that AI-assisted delivery is under control |
A prompt is a specification, a threat-model hint, a constraints document, and a review contract — not just a request for code.
Don't make every developer and every model session reinvent authentication, authorization, validation, logging, and model access controls.
Static checks, tests, dependency review, secrets scanning, model-assisted review, and human accountability together — no single judge is enough.
A secure AI coding program leaves artifacts behind: standards, PR notes, test outputs, release gates, gateway logs, and review decisions.
Start with Modules 1–3 to establish the AI coding threat model, prompting standards, and review discipline.
Move through Modules 4–7 to handle secrets, dependencies, context, retrieval, agents, and tool permissions.
Finish with Modules 8–10 to build test strategy, CI/CD gates, telemetry, and your team operating model.