From completion to defensible readiness claim.

This governed lifecycle turns completion into a defensible readiness claim by requiring evidence at every step. Learning activity from a course, lab, or project is first mapped to the target role and skill set, then converted into assessment evidence and calibrated scores. Quality review validates the signal before any readiness claim is issued. If evidence is insufficient, stale, or conflicting, the workflow diverts to exception paths that trigger a targeted development plan, assignment, and reassessment. The result is an updated readiness state grounded in validated evidence rather than completion alone.