PARTNERS

Add selected Workbench capabilities through bounded OEM and partner integrations

Explore Partner Integrations
aisecurityllc
Sign inScope an AI Security Review
aisecurityllc
Scope an AI Security Review
← Deliverablesdeliverable
deliverable

Offensive Platform Expansion Figures

Canonical expansion figures for offensive-security platform partnerships.

Public sample
Client deliverable
public-sample
System
Offensive Platform Expansion Figures
Environment
Production pilot

# Offensive Platform Expansion Figures

OP-04

Attack Engine and Evidence Plane

The partner keeps attack generation and operator workflow while the OEM Engine adds context, qualification, evidence, and defensible return objects.

Comparison showing the offensive platform retaining attack generation and operator workflow while the OEM Engine adds context and evidence qualification.

BEFOREPartner attack engineGenerate or orchestrate attacksOperator workflow and UXExecution and observed behaviorCustomer relationship and productcontextAFTEROEM Engine context and evidence planeArchitecture and authority contextEvidence and sequencequalificationShared weaknesses and chokepointsStructured partner-return objectQUALIFIED INTOOWNERSHIP BOUNDARYThe partner keeps its attack engineNo claim that the partner only producesisolated attacksPartner-native return remains a pilotobjective until proven
OP-05

Observed Attack Round Trip

The partner supplies an attack object it already understands. The OEM Engine adds only the agreed Workbench context and qualification, then returns the enriched result to the same product and lifecycle.

Closed-loop diagram: a partner attack object passes through approved system context and independent qualification, then returns to the partner platform as a partner-native result. Updated attack, remediation, or retest state remains in the partner workflow.

Normalize • Enrich • Return • Retest
  1. 1
    Partner attack object
    Attack or campaign ID • Trace and observed result • Reproduction state • Existing evidence and mappings
  2. 2
    Approved system context
    Optional architecture • Code and data paths • Agent and tool relationships • Identity, permission, and authority boundaries
  3. 3
    Independent qualification
    Grounded evidence • Explicit inference • Sequence and precondition review • Shared remediation chokepoints
  4. 4
    Partner-native return
    Stable attack identity • Evidence references • Validation state • Remediation context and retest condition
Return to stage 1 — lifecycle state preserved