ConsultingWorkbench-backed AI security engagements — map, attack, defend, and prove your AI systems.
Scope a Review

aisecurity.llc

Skill Washing

AI-labeled security titles often outpace AI-specific control, testing, and evidence language.

Title/substance mismatch

What this finding measures

Internal / Teaser Only

AI-labeled security titles often outpace AI-specific control, testing, and evidence language.

Use only as exploratory teaser or internal prioritization.

Based on analyzed job-description signals, not proof of any individual company’s internal security maturity.

Specificity gap

Cross-vertical signal

Chart targets

  • chart_skill_washing_scatter
  • chart_industry_specificity_score
  • chart_survey_interview_fail_reason

Active filters: period=all, industry=all, seniority=all

Clear

Evidence charts

Current chart outputs for this finding

Finding Evidence

AI Label Versus AI Security Substance

AI title/keyword strength compared against AI-specific security role substance.

v_ai_title_substance_scatter
Source: v_ai_title_substance_scatter
This measures role-language signal, not intent or deception.

Spec title: AI Label Versus AI Security Substance

Chart ID: chart_skill_washing_scatter

Source: v_ai_title_substance_scatter

Caption: This chart compares AI labeling strength with substantive AI security specificity.

Chart caveat: This measures role-language signal, not intent or deception.

Deck note: Use this chart carefully. Avoid saying companies are lying.

chart_industry_specificity_score

Chart contract is missing from the public chart catalog.

chart_survey_interview_fail_reason

Chart contract is missing from the public chart catalog.

Recommended actions

What leaders should do next

Rewrite job specs around technical outputs and control ownership.
Require role-language evidence of AI-specific implementation work.
Train recruiting teams away from keyword-only filters.

Browse the full citation library for supporting research and source quotes.

Evidence library →